© 1971 by British Computer Society
Controversy concerning the criteria for taxonometric strategies


1 CSIRO, Division of Tropical Pastures, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia, 2 CSIRO, Division of Computing Research, Canberra City, Australia, 3 CSIRO, Division of Plant Industry, Canberra City, Australia, 4 Department of Botany, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
Recent growth of interest in numerical classificatory strategies has led to the search for criteria which such strategies should fulfil. Two largely incompatible schools of thought have now arisen, one in Cambridge the other in Australia: the article examines the differences in the basic premises of these schools with particular reference to linguistic differences and the wider implications of the two sets of criteria.
Received October 1970.
* CSIRO, Division of Tropical Pastures, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
CSIRO, Division of Computing Research, Canberra City, Australia.
¶ CSIRO, Division of Plant Industry, Canberra City, Australia.
Department of Botany, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. W. Milligan and M. C. Cooper Methodology Review: Clustering Methods Applied Psychological Measurement, December 1, 1987; 11(4): 329 - 354. [Abstract] |
||||
![]() |
P. Willett Document clustering using an inverted file approach Journal of Information Science, January 1, 1980; 2(5): 223 - 231. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hubert and F. B. Baker Data Analysis by Single-Link and Complete-Link Hierarchical Clustering Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 1976; 1(2): 87 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||


