Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1975 18(4):298-306; doi:10.1093/comjnl/18.4.298
© 1975 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, P. J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The conversion of decision tables to sequential testing procedures

P. J. H. King1 and R. G. Johnson2 *

1 Department of Computer Science, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London, UK, 2 Computer Analysts and Programmers Ltd., 14/15 Great James Street, London, UK

This paper presents a general method for the conversion of a decision table to a sequential testing procedure represented as a tree. The method resolves difficulties which have been discussed previously in the literature but leaves open the question of the production of optimum or near optimum trees related to particular criteria. It provides, however, a framework within which such optimising methods may be developed. Suggestions are also made for improving the concepts and notations used in extended entry tables and for their use in translation.


Received March 1974.

* now at: Computer Analysts and Programmers Ltd., 14/15 Great James Street, London, WC1N 3DY.

§ Department of Computer Science, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.