Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1984 27(4):340-347; doi:10.1093/comjnl/27.4.340
© 1984 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prather, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

An Axiomatic Theory of Software Complexity Measure

R. E. Prather *

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA

In software engineering, various ‘metrics’ have been introduced in an attempt to measure the complexity of programs. We show how the whole idea of a ‘software complexity measure’ can be axiomatized in such a way as to include the more familiar concrete examples and to allow for new measures that might offer advantages not captured by those previously introduced. In particular, a new testing measure is introduced, based on the ‘multiple-condition’ test strategy. Comparisons are made between this new measure and the more traditional metrics. In addition, a more general theoretical study is initiated, showing the effect of the axiomatic development in relation to the treatment of program structuredness.


Received December 1982.

* Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.