Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1988 31(2):165-174; doi:10.1093/comjnl/31.2.165
© 1988 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bastani, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, I-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Concurrent Maintenance of Data Structures in a Distributed Environment

F. B. Bastani1 *, S. S. Iyengar2 § and I-L. Yen3 ¶

1 Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, University Park, Houston, Texas 77004, USA, 2 Department of Computer Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA, 3 Valid Logic, Inc., 2820 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, CA 95134, USA

We consider a distributed system consisting of a collection of clients and servers in which each server runs on a processor dedicated to it. Each server can be viewed as an instance of an abstract data-type module that provides a set of facilities for its clients. In such systems it may be possible to improve the performance of a server by scheduling its housekeeping activities to occur during periods when the server is waiting for requests from clients or is transmitting a response to a client. We consider the case where the client requests are handled by a foreground process while the maintenance tasks are performed by one or more background processes. We illustrate how the code for these processes can be developed in a stepwise manner, proceeding from coarse-grained concurrency to fine-grained concurrency. This approach is augmented with the use of rely/guarantee conditions which serve to simplify the proof of non-interference. The method is illustrated using a search-table abstraction.


Received November 1986. revised July 1987.

* Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, University Park, Houston, Texas 77004, USA

§ Department of Computer Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA

Valid Logic, Inc., 2820 Orchard Parkway, San Jose, CA 95134, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.