Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1993 36(3):209-216; doi:10.1093/comjnl/36.3.209
© 1993 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Leeuwen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Interval Heaps

J. van Leeuwen1 * and D. Wood2 §

1 Department of Computer Science, University of Utrecht, PO Box 80.089, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2 Department of Computer Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada

We present new solutions to the problems of constructing efficient implicit data structures for min-max and min-max-median priority queues. The novelty in our approach is that we use the standard heap (or priority queue) structure with multiple values at the nodes. This technique yields a consistent approach to the implementation of min-max and min-max-median priority queues. The first advantage of this approach is that the updating algorithms are almost the same as those for the standard heap implementation of a priority queue. The second advantage is that we can easily generalize the heap structure to accommodate multidimensional data. The third advantage is that we immediately derive optimal query algorithms for complementary-range queries. A number of applications to computational geometry are discussed. By generalizing the approach for d-dimensional data, a (dynamic) implicit data structure is obtained for complementary-range searching in {Theta}(K) time per query and with {Theta}(log n) update time, for fixed d, where K is the number of answers to a query. Several related ideas and applications are also discussed.


Received April 1988. revised June 1992.

* Department of Computer Science, University of Utrecht, PO Box 80.089, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands

§ Department of Computer Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.