Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1996 39(6):547-554; doi:10.1093/comjnl/39.6.547
© 1996 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Majewski, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Czech, Z. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

A Family of Perfect Hashing Methods

B. S. Majewski1 *, N. C. Wormald2 §, G. Havas3 ¶ and Z. J. Czech4 {ddagger}

1 Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Newcastle, Callaghan NSW 2308, Australia, 2 Department of Mathematics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia, 3 Department of Computer Science, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia, 4 Institutes of Computer Science, Silesia University of Technology and Polish Academy of Sciences, Gliwice, Poland 44-100.

Minimal perfect hash functions are used for memory efficient storage and fast retrieval of items from static sets. We present an infinite family of efficient and practical algorithms for generating order preserving minimal perfect hash functions. We show that almost all members of the family construct space and time optimal order preserving minimal perfect hash functions, and we identify the one with minimum constants. Members of the family generate a hash function in two steps. First a special kind of function into an r-graph is computed probabilistically. Then this function is refined deterministically to a minimal perfect has function. We give strong theoretical evidence that the first step uses linear random time. The second step runs in linear deterministic time. The family not only has theoretical importance, but also offers the fastest known methods for generating perfect hash functions.


Received February 7, 1995. revised July 4, 1996.

* Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Newcastle, Callaghan NSW 2308

§ Department of Mathematics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052

Department of Computer Science, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia

{ddagger} Institutes of Computer Science, Silesia University of Technology and Polish Academy of Sciences, Gliwice, Poland 44-100

++ Email: havas{at}cs.uq.edu.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.