Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1996 39(8):663-674; doi:10.1093/comjnl/39.8.663
© 1996 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Djordjevic, G. Lj.
Right arrow Articles by Tosic, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

A Compile-Time Scheduling Heuristic for Multiprocessor Architectures

G. Lj. Djordjevic * and M. B. Tosic *

Faculty of Electronic Engineering, University of Nis, Beogradska 14, P.O. Box 73, 18000 Nis, Serbia, Yugoslavia. Email: gdjordjevic{at}europa.elfak.ni.ac.yu

The multiprocessor scheduling problem can be stated as finding a schedule for a task graph to be executed on a multiprocessor architecture so that the execution time can be minimized. Since this problem is known to be NP-hard, in all but a few very restricted cases, the main research efforts in this area are focused on heuristic methods for obtaining near-optimal solutions in a reasonable amount of time. A new compile-time single-pass multiprocessor scheduling technique, called chaining, has been developed and is presented in this paper. Chaining can be used to schedule task graphs onto multiprocessor architectures that contain an arbitrary number of processors connected in an irregular fashion, taking into account the expected execution and communication requirements of the task graph on the given multiprocess architecture. This technique can be viewed as a generalization of the list scheduling technique, that does not impose any preconditions about the ordering according to which tasks are selected for scheduling. Varying the selection criteria, implemented in this technique, we have generated a new class of scheduling algorithms. An evaluation of this class was made on 360 randomly generated examples, and the estimated performances were compared with two list scheduling algorithms, the dynamic level scheduler proposed by Sih and Lee, and the earliest task first algorithm proposed by Hwang et al.


Received June 28, 1995. revised July 25, 1996.

* Faculty of Electronic Engineering, University of Nis, Beogradska 14, P.O. Box 73, 18000 Nis, Serbia, Yugoslavia Email: gdjordjevic{at}europa.elfak.ni.ac.yu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.