Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1997 40(10):598-616; doi:10.1093/comjnl/40.10.598
© 1997 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sjøberg, D. I. K.
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Software Constraints for Large Application Systems

D. I. K. Sjøberg1, R. Welland2 and M. P. Atkinson2

1 Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1080 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway Email: Dag.Sjoberg{at}ifi.uio.no, 2 Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, 17 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

As application systems live longer and grow in size and complexity, there is an ever increasing need for methods and tools that can support software builders in constructing maintainable, well-structured and consistent systems. This paper describes the notion of software constraints as an aid to developing such systems. Software constraints make rules and conventions commonly agreed to in a given programming environment explicit and automatically checkable. The potential usefulness of software constraints was investigated in both industrial and research environments. A framework for categorization of such constraints is defined. Constraints are proposed that are generally applicable and others that are tightly connected to and support a certain programming method. Tools for automatic checking are crucial if software constraints are to be used. An architecture for such tools and two realizations are described.


Received October 16, 1996. revised December 2, 1997.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.