Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1997 40(2 and 3):76-93; doi:10.1093/comjnl/40.2_and_3.76
© 1997 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bunton, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Semantically Motivated Improvements for PPM Variants

S. Bunton

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of Washington, Box 352350, Seattle, WA 98195-2350, USA Email: bunton{at}cs.washington.edu

The on-line sequence modelling algorithm ‘Prediction by Partial Matching’ (PPM) has set the performance standard in lossless data compression research since Moffat's 1990 implementation, PPMC. Despite intense research activity, only Howard's 1993 escape-count update mechanism ‘D’ has provided any consistent, order-independent performance improvement to PPMC (about 1%). Most notably, the recently introduced PPM variant, PPM*, which eliminates PPM's order bound, fails to offer compression results superior to those of PPMC with Markov order greater than four. This paper explains how to significantly improve the compression performance of any PPM variant (by 5–12%) by combining PPM's probability estimator, ‘blending’, with information-theoretic state selection. Hazards inherent to this combination are overcome by identifying the distinct semantics of the two approaches and resolving the differences using a dual-frequency update mechanism. We present and apply our percolating state selector, plus an enhancement to blending, both of which we have recently shown to independently outperform all competing techniques from the literature. We also give a minimal linear-space suffix-tree implementation of PPM and PPM*. Performance is measured in experiments run on the Calgary Corpus using our reimplementation of the original algorithms in an executable cross-product of independent model components, which permits precise control of all modelling algorithm features.


Received July, 1996. revised March, 1997.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.