Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1997 40(4):208-219; doi:10.1093/comjnl/40.4.208
© 1997 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahlgren, F.
Right arrow Articles by Björkman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Reducing the Read-miss Penalty for Flat COMA Protocols

F. Dahlgren, P. Stenström1 and M. Björkman2

1 Department of Computer Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden, 2 Mentor Graphics Scandinavia AB, PO Box 1147, S-164 22 Kista, Sweden, 3 Email: dahlgren{at}ce.chalmers.se

In flat cache-only memory architectures (COMA), an attraction-memory miss must first interrogate a directory before a copy of the requested data can be located, which often involves three network traversals. By keeping track of the identity of a potential holder of the copy–called a hint–one network traversal can be saved which reduces the read penalty. We have evaluated the reduction of the read-miss penalty provided by hints using detailed architectural simulations and four benchmark applications. The results show that a previously proposed protocol using hints can actually make the read-miss penalty larger because when the hint is not correct, an extra network traversal is needed. This has motivated us to study a new protocol, using hints, that simultaneously sends a request to the potential holder and to the directory. This protocol reduces the read-miss penalty for all applications but the protocol complexity does not seem to justify the performance improvement.


Received May 21, 1996. revised July 17, 1997.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.