Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1997 40(5):259-277; doi:10.1093/comjnl/40.5.259
© 1997 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bolognesi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Expressive Flexibility of a Constraint-oriented Notation

T. Bolognesi

CNR, Istituto IEI, Pisa, Italy Email: t.bolognesi{at}iei.pi.cnr.it

We illustrate the expressive flexibility of the ‘co-notation’, a declarative, structured, constraint-oriented specification technique for concurrent systems where constraints on actions and on data variables are intertwined. Flexibility is intended here as the ability to closely match the structure of the initial, informal behavioural description of the system, and to directly formalize the conceptual links among data variables and events, and their groupings, as expressed in that description. We contrast the co-notation with two related and ‘mature’ specification techniques, namely predicate/transition Petri nets and LOTOS, also by means of a running example. The Petri net approach supports a quite direct specification of the links among actions and data variables, but it lacks structuring facilities; LOTOS does support encapsulation, but its process-oriented view does not offer full flexibility in defining and composing groups of those conceptual links. We show that the simple yet powerful constraint conjunction operator of the co-notation, supporting both shared-action (rendez-vous) and shared-variable interaction mechanisms, achieves a higher expressive flexibility than the other models, and brings to a full exploitation the constraint-oriented reasoning partially offered by LOTOS.


Received March 21, 1997. revised August 8, 1997.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.