Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1997 40(6):302-310; doi:10.1093/comjnl/40.6.302
© 1997 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, H.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Fortes, J. A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Communication-Minimal Partitioning and Data Alignment for Affine Nested Loops

H.-J. Lee1 and J. A. B. Fortes2

1 Department of Computer Science, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71272, USA Email: hlee{at}engr.latech.edu, 2 School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907, USA

Data alignment and computation domain partitioning techniques have been widely investigated to reduce communication overheads in distributed memory systems. This paper considers how these two techniques can be combined and applied to affine nested loops. Current data alignment techniques focus on individual entries of data arrays and, in general, cannot be used directly for cases when blocks of entries should be aligned collectively. This paper shows that existing data alignment techniques can be applied to partitioned algorithms if the null space of the data array indexing matrix is a boundary of computation blocks or the intersection of some computation block boundaries. These conditions can be used to generate several different partitionings and time–space transformations for a given target architecture. An example illustrates how it is possible to trade-off the number of communications and the memory space. Another example shows partitions of matrix–matrix multiplication that have smaller communication–computation ratios than Cannon's algorithm.


Received November 10, 1996. revised July 25, 1997.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.