Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1997 40(6):322-339; doi:10.1093/comjnl/40.6.322
© 1997 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ju, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chaudhary, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Unique Sets Oriented Parallelization of Loops with Non-uniform Dependences

J. Ju and V. Chaudhary

Parallel and Distributed Computing Laboratory, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA Email: vipin{at}eng.wayne.edu

Although many methods exist for nested loop partitioning, most of them perform poorly when parallelizing loops with non-uniform dependences. This paper addresses the issue of automatic parallelization of loops with non-uniform dependences. Such loops are normally not parallelized by existing parallelizing compilers and transformations. Even when parallelized in rare instances, the performance is very poor. Our approach is based on the ‘convex hull’ theory which has adequate information to handle non-uniform dependences. We introduce the concept of ‘complete dependence convex hull’, ‘unique head and tail sets’ and abstract the dependence information into these sets. These sets form the basis of the iteration space partitions. The properties of the unique head and tail sets are derived. Depending on the relative placement of these unique sets, partitioning schemes are suggested for implementation of our technique. Implementation results of our scheme on the Cray J916 and comparison with other schemes show the superiority of our technique.


Received November 4, 1996. revised July 15, 1997.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.