Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1999 42(1):11-23; doi:10.1093/comjnl/42.1.11
© 1999 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kocberber, S
Right arrow Articles by Patton, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Optimization of signature file parameters for databases with varying record lengths

S KocberberA1, F CanA and JM PattonA3

A1 Department of Computer Engineering and Information Science, Bilkent University, Bilkent, 06533 Ankara, Turkey A Department of Systems Analysis, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA A3 Department of Applied Technologies, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA Entail: seyit@bilkent.edu.tr

For signature files we propose a new false drop estimation method for databases with varying record lengths. Our approach provides more accurate estimation of the number of false drops by considering the lengths of individual records instead of using the average number of terms per record. In signature file processing, accurate estimation of the number of false drops is essential to obtain a more accurate signature file and therefore to obtain a better (query) response time. With a formal proof we show that under certain conditions the number of false drops estimated by considering the average record length is less than or equal to the precise 'expected' estimation which is based on the individual record lengths. The experiments with real data show that the proposed method accurately estimates the number of false drops and the actual response time. Depending on the space overhead, our approach obtains up to 33% and 20% response time improvements for the conventional sequential and new efficient multiframe signature file methods, respectively.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.