Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 2000 43(3):177-190; doi:10.1093/comjnl/43.3.177
© 2000 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tambouratzis, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Counter-clustering for Training Pattern Selection

Tatiana Tambouratzis1

1 Institute of Nuclear Technology–Radiation Protection, NCSR ‘Demokritos’, Aghia Paraskevi 153 10, Athens, Greece Email: tatiana@ipta.demokritos.gr

Training pattern selection consists of selecting a subset of patterns from a given training set so that the size of the set is reduced while its representational power is not affected. Training pattern selection is especially desirable for the effective operation of nearest-neighbour-based decision systems and for fast training of artificial neural networks. Counter-clustering is proposed here for training pattern selection. Based on a harmony-theory artificial neural network, counter-clustering exposes the clusters that exist within each class of the training set and provides a measure of the interior/exterior nature of each training pattern. Training pattern selection is, subsequently, accomplished one-shot, by retaining the boundary, isolated and exterior training patterns, while discarding most of the interior training patterns from each cluster. Examples of training pattern selection via counter-clustering are presented; the corresponding pattern classification results are reported and evaluated.


Received 11 January, 1999. Revised 14 February, 2000.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.