Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 2001 44(1):21-30; doi:10.1093/comjnl/44.1.21
© 2001 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anastasi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Santone, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Efficient Verification of a Multicast Protocol for Mobile Computing

Giuseppe Anastasi1, Alberto Bartoli2, Nicoletta De Francesco1 and Antonella Santone1,3

1 Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione, Universitá di Pisa, Italy Email: antonella.santone@iet.unipi.it 2 Dipartimento di Elettrotecnica, Elettronica ed Informatica, Universitá di Trieste, Italy 3 Corresponding author.

We present the formal verification of a multicast protocol for mobile computing. The protocol supports reliable and totally ordered communication within a set of processes running on mobile hosts. Mobile hosts communicate with a wired infrastructure through wireless links. The protocol is specified in Calculus of Communicating Systems and checked using the Concurrency Workbench tool. The protocol was chosen as a case study to evaluate the usefulness of a methodology, by means of which a property is checked on a reduced system, where the reduction is driven by the formula expressing the property itself. The reduction is obtained by transforming the program into one having a smaller representation. The approach is based on a logic, the selective mu-calculus, which has the characteristic that each formula allows the immediate pointing out of the parts of the system that do not alter the truth value of the formula itself, and thus can be ignored. We show and discuss the experimental results obtained.


Received 29 November, 1999. Revised 6 November, 2000.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.