Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 2004 47(3):309-319; doi:10.1093/comjnl/47.3.309
© 2004 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perkins, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ryley, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Robust Data Compression: Consistency Checking in the Synchronization of Variable Length Codes

S. Perkins1,*, D. H. Smith1 and A. Ryley1

1 Division of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, Wales CF37 1DL, UK

Many data compression techniques are essentially variable length codes. Such codes suffer from a vulnerability to error propagation. This occurs when an error causes the correspondence between the data stream and the stream of encoded symbols to be lost and continues until synchronization between the two is re-established. This paper compares a number of strategies for synchronization in which redundant synchronizing words are used with a mechanism for labelling or counting them. In each case the strategy is investigated for the prevention of error propagation, ensuring the re-establishment of the correspondence with the correct point in the data stream. Three classes of potential synchronization error are explored: the false recognition of spurious words, the loss of synchronizing words and synchronization misinterpretation, when one synchronizing word is confused with another. The probabilities of synchronization error are analysed. It is shown that the strategies are successful against random errors when they incorporate some mechanism for consistency checking. The relative merits of different schemes are demonstrated. The schemes are also compared with the technique known as bitstuffing. This is considered on its own and in combination with the other schemes.


Received 5 September 2002. Revised 23 October 2003.

* Email: sperkins{at}glam.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.