Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 2005 48(2):239-252; doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxh077
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cantarell, S.
Right arrow Articles by Villain, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Computer Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Group Mutual Exclusion in Token Rings

Sébastien Cantarell1, Ajoy K. Datta2 *, Franck Petit3 and Vincent Villain3

1 LRI/CNRS, Université de Paris-Sud, France, 2 School of Computer Science, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Nevada, 3 LaRIA/CNRS, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, France

The group mutual exclusion (GME) problem was introduced by Joung. The GME solution allows n processes to share m mutually exclusive resources. We present several algorithms to solve the GME problem in token rings. The space requirement and the size of messages of all algorithms are bounded. So, the proposed algorithms solve the problem suggested by Joung, which is to obtain a solution using messages of bounded size. The time and space complexities of the first and second algorithms depend on n and m respectively. The first algorithm is more efficient when n << m, whereas the second one when m << n. The cost of the third algorithm is min(n, m). So, it is suitable for any type of network. However, the third solution is obtained with a message size of log(min(n, m)) extra bits. The third algorithm has an additional desirable property. It serves the requests in a first in first out manner. The fourth algorithm improves the bandwidth usage by avoiding the token circulation when no new requests are made for a different session. This property of the fourth algorithm can be incorporated into the other three algorithms.


Received 8 August 2003. revised 27 September 2004.

* Email: datta{at}cs.unlv.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.