Skip Navigation


The Computer Journal Advance Access originally published online on January 19, 2008
The Computer Journal 2008 51(6):615-629; doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxm079
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/6/615    most recent
bxm079v2
bxm079v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomasian, A.
Right arrow Articles by Xu, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Computer Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Reliability and Performance of Mirrored Disk Organizations

Alexander Thomasian1,2,* and Jun Xu1

1 Computer Science Department, New Jersey Institute of Technology – NJIT, Newark, NJ 07102, USA
2 Thomasian and Associates, 17 Meadowbrook Road, Pleasantville, NY 10570, USA

* Corresponding author: alexthomasian{at}gmail.com, jx6{at}njit.edu

Received 7 March 2006; revised 25 July 2007

Disk mirroring or redundant array of independent disk (RAID) level 1 is a popular paradigm to achieve fault-tolerance and a higher disk access bandwidth for read requests. We consider four RAID1 organizations: basic mirroring (BM), group rotate declustering (GRD), interleaved declustering (ID) and chained declustering (CD). The last three organizations provide a more balanced disk load than BM when a single disk fails, but are more susceptible to data loss than BM when additional disks fail. We compare the four organizations from the viewpoint of: (i) reliability [we quote results from [Thomasian, A. and Blaum, M. (2006) Reliability analysis of mirrored disks. IEEE Trans. Comput., 55, 1640–1644.]] (ii) performability, (iii) performance. In (ii) and (iii), we postulate discrete requests to small randomly placed blocks. For (ii), we compute the mean number of disk requests processed to the point where data loss occurs. For the sake of tractability in (iii), the response time is obtained assuming Poisson arrivals and a first come first serve policy. The ranking from the viewpoint of reliability and performability is: BM, CD, GRD, ID (with two clusters). BM and CD provide the worst performance, ID has a better performance than BM and CD, but is outperformed by GRD. These results are also shown using an asymptotic expansion method. Areas of further research are also discussed, which include the applicability of the mirroring techniques to storage bricks.

Key Words: mirrored disks • RAID level 1 • RAID1 • interleaved declustering • chained declustering • group rotate declustering • reliability modeling • performance analysis • queueing theory


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.