Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1964 7(1):72-75; doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.1.72
© 1964 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lynn, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

On the equivalence of SOR, SSOR and USSOR as applied to {sigma}1-ordered systems of linear equations

M. S. Lynn *

National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK

The method of symmetric successive over-relaxation (SSOR) was proposed by Sheldon (1955). It has been analyzed by Habetler and Wachspress (1961) and extended to the method of unsymmetric successive over-relaxation (USSOR) by D'Sylva and Miles (1964). The latter showed that for suitable choice of relaxation parameters asymptotic rates of convergence precisely half of those of the familiar method of successive over-relaxation (SOR) may be obtained when the method is applied to {sigma}1-ordered systems of linear equations possessing Property A. The present paper shows that this factor is in fact spurious, and that, under the latter hypotheses, the methods of SOR, SSOR and USSOR are identical when applied to {sigma}1-ordered systems of equations. it is hence shown that Chebyshev accelerated SSR (SSOR with unity relaxation parameter) becomes, in this case, identical with the Chebyshev accelerated Gauss-Seidel method (Varga (1957)). The theoretical results of D'Sylva and Miles and of this paper and the vastly different behaviours of the {sigma}1- and {sigma}2-orderings are emphasized by means of numerical examples.



* * National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.