Skip Navigation



The Computer Journal Advance Access published online on April 18, 2008

The Computer Journal, doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxn009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Lu, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Computer Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Congruence Formats for Weak Readiness Equivalence and Weak Possible Future Equivalence

Xiaowei Huang1,*, Li Jiao2 and Weiming Lu1

1 Academy of Mathematics and System Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 55# East Road, Zhong Guan Cun Beijing 100080, P.R. China
2 State Key Laboratory of Computer Science, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 4# South Fourth Street, Zhong Guan Cun, Beijing 100190, P.R. China

* Corresponding author: xwhuang{at}amss.ac.cn

Received 26 June 2007; revised 17 January 2008

Accepted for publication 25 January 2008.

Weak equivalences are important behavioral equivalences in the course of specifying and analyzing reactive systems using process algebraic languages. In this paper, we propose a series of weak equivalences named weak parametric readiness equivalences, which take two previously known behavioral equivalences, i.e. the weak readiness equivalence and the weak possible future equivalence, as their special cases. More importantly, based on the idea of structural operational semantics, a series of rule formats are presented to guarantee congruence for these weak parametric readiness equivalences, i.e. to show that the proposed rule formats can guarantee the congruence of their corresponding weak parametric readiness equivalences. This series of rule formats reflects the differences in the weak parametric readiness equivalences. We conclude that when the weak parametric readiness equivalences become coarser, their corresponding rule formats turn tighter.

Key Words: weak equivalences • congruence formats • structural operational semantics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.