Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1986 29(5):475-476; doi:10.1093/comjnl/29.5.475
© 1986 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shackel, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

IBM makes usability as important as functionality*

B. Shackel §

HUSAT Research Centre, University of Technology, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK

Functionality has for many years been the overriding criterion in the computer industry; in no small measure this has been due to the influence of IBM. Since 1981 a major change of policy at IBM has become evident, but is still little known. This short historical note presents the evidence and describes how IBM no longer gives supreme importance to functionality but now gives equal importance to usability.


Received December 1985.

* Nothing in this paper is based on confidential information; all is published or from open discussions.

§ HUSAT Research Centre, University of Technology, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.