Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 1998 41(8):537-546; doi:10.1093/comjnl/41.8.537
© 1998 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y. H.
Right arrow Articles by Jain, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Classification of Text Documents

Y. H. Li and A. K. Jain

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA Email: liyongho{at}cps.msu.edu, jain{at}cps.msu.edu

The exponential growth of the internet has led to a great deal of interest in developing useful and efficient tools and software to assist users in searching the Web. Document retrieval, categorization, routing and filtering can all be formulated as classification problems. However, the complexity of natural languages and the extremely high dimensionality of the feature space of documents have made this classification problem very difficult. We investigate four different methods for document classification: the naive Bayes classifier, the nearest neighbour classifier, decision trees and a subspace method. These were applied to seven-class Yahoo news groups (business, entertainment, health, international, politics, sports and technology) individually and in combination. We studied three classifier combination approaches: simple voting, dynamic classifier selection and adaptive classifier combination. Our experimental results indicate that the naive Bayes classifier and the subspace method outperform the other two classifiers on our data sets. Combinations of multiple classifiers did not always improve the classification accuracy compared to the best individual classifier. Among the three different combination approaches, our adaptive classifier combination method introduced here performed the best. The best classification accuracy that we are able to achieve on this seven-class problem is approximately 83%, which is comparable to the performance of other similar studies. However, the classification problem considered here is more difficult because the pattern classes used in our experiments have a large overlap of words in their corresponding documents.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.