Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 2001 44(5):425-434; doi:10.1093/comjnl/44.5.425
© 2001 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luk, R. W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Compact Morphic Directed Acyclic Word Graphs

Robert W. P. Luk1

1 Department of Computing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Email: csrluk@comp.polyu.edu.hk

A directed acyclic word graph (DAWG) represents all factors of a string $t$ over $\Sigma$. By some isomorphism $h:\Sigma^*\rightarrow(\sigma^q)^*$, with parameter $q$, the string $t$ can be transformed into $h(t)$, the factors of which are represented by another DAWG, called the morphic DAWG, over a different alphabet $\sigma$. Depending on $h$, $t$ has many morphic DAWGs, which exhibit time–space trade-off compared with the original DAWG. The bounds for storage reduction and time–space efficiency between DAWG and its morphic DAWGs implemented as tables are derived, as well as for their optimal points. Likewise, the storage increase, comparing the morphic DAWG implemented as tables and DAWGs implemented using bucket arrays, are also derived. The bounds of storage increase have global minimum when $|\sigma|=3$. Experiments show that round-off errors degrade storage reduction and time–space efficiency, so that $q$ should be well chosen (i.e. $|\sigma|^q=|\Sigma|$). The compact morphic DAWG was found to be more space efficient than both the corresponding morphic DAWG and the compact DAWG. The compact morphic DAWGs over the binary alphabet require the least storage but the access speed is slower than those over the ternary alphabet. The space demand of compact morphic DAWGs is of similar order (within a factor of 3.3) of the bucket-array implementation of DAWGs.


Received 8 March, 2001. Revised 2 May, 2001.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.