Skip Navigation

The Computer Journal 2001 44(6):557-568; doi:10.1093/comjnl/44.6.557
© 2001 by British Computer Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Khoshgoftaar, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Software Quality Prediction for High-Assurance Network Telecommunications Systems

Zhiwei Xu1 and Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar1

1 Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA Email: taghi@cse.fau.edu

Modern high-assurance network telecommunications systems often must have high software reliability. Software quality models yield timely predictions of quality indicators on a module-by-module basis, enabling one to target enhancement techniques. This paper introduces fuzzy nonlinear regression (FNR) to practitioners in high-assurance systems engineering. FNR integrates fuzzy logic and neural networks techniques to generate good results. We present an innovative method that differs from other FNRs such that the statistics of the dependent variable are used to build the FNR instead of focusing on the cost function. We tested our model in a large network telecommunications system written in a Pascal-like proprietary language. Data splitting was applied in the case study. In order to avoid the unfair partition of the data set, we randomly split the data thirty times and performed the experiment for each iteration. We also conducted our experiment using multiple linear regression (MLR) and we found that the results of FNR were significantly better than those using MLR


Received 3 November, 2000. Revised 2 May, 2001.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.